Administrative Law Matters

Commentary on developments in administrative law, particularly judicial review of administrative action by common law courts.

Comments

Administrative Law Values, Constitutional Principles and Mandatory Orders: R (Imam) v London Borough of Croydon [2023] UKSC 45

When a court finds in judicial review proceedings that a decision was unlawful, it must then turn its mind to the question of remedy. Of all the available remedies in the judicial armoury, the mandatory order is the most far-reaching and intrusive. Particular care is required before deploying it, as Lord Sales’s analysis in R […] Read more

Comments

“Policy” in Administrative Law

“Policy” is one of the most poorly defined terms in the social sciences, as Professor Cairney has observed (The Politics of Evidence-Based Policy Making (2016), at p. 4). In law, the situation is little better. My focus here is on public administration, so I will confine my observations to the law of public administration — […] Read more

Comments

Against ATCO: Text, Purpose & Context, not “Implied” and “Express” Powers

I have a new paper coming out next year in the Advocates’ Quarterly, entitled “Against ATCO: Text, Purpose & Context, not “Implied” and “Express” Powers“: It is often said that administrative bodies have no inherent jurisdiction, only those powers granted by the legislature. Questions about the scope of regulatory authority arise frequently and are often […] Read more

Comments

The Administration of Justice in Administrative Tribunals: Zalewski v. Adjudication Office [2021] IESC 24 (Practical Consequences)

See my introductory note here and previous posts here (on Article 34.1) and here (on Article 37.1). See also Tom Hickey’s note on Zalewski, available open-access from the Modern Law Review, Now, the reader may be wondering what, if any, practical consequences this decision carries. The interpretive discussion of Articles 34.1 and 37.1 is all […] Read more

Comments

The Administration of Justice in Administrative Tribunals: Zalewski v. Adjudication Office [2021] IESC 24 (Article 37.1)

See my introductory note here and previous post (on Article 34.1) here. Article 37.1 was designed as a ‘saver’ clause to ensure that administrative decision-makers could exercise some powers and functions of a judicial nature. The historical background is covered in McKechnie J’s dissenting opinion (at paras. 25-30). I think the history is ambiguous (a […] Read more