Following from my previous post and based on Prime Minister’s Trudeau remarks this morning, I would think the prospects for any successful challenge are low. The Prime Minister announced this morning that he would be resigning both as leader of the Liberal Party of Canada and from office as soon as a successor is selected […] Read more

There is an end-of-days feeling around Ottawa at the moment. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, it seems, is not long for this (political world). He leads a minority administration and, though he has governed in that way since the last election, the opposition parties now say they will vote no confidence at the first available opportunity. […] Read more

Any foray by the Supreme Court into an area of controversy will invariably leave some questions unanswered. That is the case with Auer as well. Building on my previous note on the decision (see here), three jump out at me. First, the requirements of the presumption of validity are unclear. There is a plausible case […] Read more

Today marks the fifth anniversary of the Supreme Court of Canada’s landmark decision in Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65, [2019] 4 SCR 653. 2019 is really a world away. On the afternoon of the release of the decision, I held a dial-in session where I delivered my thoughts into […] Read more

The Federal Court of Appeal recently released an interesting decision at the intersection of constitutional and administrative law in Galderma Canada Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2024 FCA 208 (I was co-counsel for the appellant). The case involved a judicial review of a decision of the Patented Medicines Prices Review Board purporting to regulate an […] Read more

I have a new paper, “Artificial Intelligence and Administrative Tribunals“, prepared for a forthcoming volume edited by Matthew Groves and Yee-Fui Ng. Here is the abstract of a fairly optimistic paper: In this paper, I will examine the implications of artificial intelligence for administrative tribunals. I will briefly set the scene in Part I by describing […] Read more

The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in the Auer case (noted here) confirmed that the standard of review applicable to regulations is reasonableness: the judicial review analysis must be conducted under the Vavilov framework. Auer had a companion decision on discriminatory regulations: TransAlta Generation Partnership v. Alberta, 2024 SCC 37. In this decision dealing with […] Read more

The Supreme Court of Canada handed down its much-anticipated decision on standard of review of regulations in Auer v. Auer, 2024 SCC 36 this morning. I was co-counsel for the appellant, Roland Auer. After the hearing back in April, two things seemed quite clear to me: the Supreme Court would apply the Vavilov framework to […] Read more

I am giving a couple of ‘year in review’ talks in the coming weeks, to the CLEBC Administrative Law Conference in Vancouver on November 21, and the Canadian Bar Association’s Administrative Law, and Labour and Employment Law Conference in Ottawa on November 29. I’ve posted the CLEBC version of the paper to SSRN, “Correctness, Reasonableness […] Read more