Administrative Law Matters
Commentary on developments in administrative law, particularly judicial review of administrative action by common law courts.
Comments
Putting the Genie back in the Bottle: the Growth of Substantive Review
Paul Daly October 1, 2014
In his plenary paper at the Public Law Conference, Mark Aronson discussed the growth of substantive review in Australia, a phenomenon that can be glimpsed in most common-law jurisdictions. Mark gave three reasons for growth: 1. The rise of reasons (as a requirement imposed by statute or common law, or, I would add, self-imposed for […] Read more
Comments
Beware the Artful Pleader: the Public-Private Divide
Paul Daly September 29, 2014
Canada distinguishes between public law and private law. Judicial review of administrative action is kept separate from the law of tort, contract, property and equity. In an important 2010 decision (Canada (Attorney General) v. TeleZone Inc., [2010] 3 SCR 585, 2010 SCC 62), the Supreme Court of Canada signaled that the importance of the distinction […] Read more
Comments
Affidavits on Judicial Review: What’s New is Old
Paul Daly September 26, 2014 Administrative law / Common law history and methods
I have been known to complain about courts and administrators supplementing the administrative record after a decision has been made. In a case last year, a Canadian appellate court deferred to an interpretation of law offered in an affidavit. I was reminded at the Public Law Conference that the use of affidavits to bolster the […] Read more
Comments
The Unity of Legitimate Expectations?
Paul Daly September 25, 2014 Administrative law / Public law theory
One of the panels at the inaugural Public Law Conference last week (see my previous post) was on legitimate expectations. I was keenly interested, as I have agreed to contribute a chapter to a forthcoming (early 2016) collection on legitimate expectations in the common law world. Cora Hoexter was sympathetic to legitimate expectations as she […] Read more
Comments
The “Common Objective” of Courts and Administrators: Correctly Applying the Principles of Statutory Interpretation?
Paul Daly September 24, 2014
How should we describe what administrative decision-makers do when they interpret statutory provisions? In my view, they are making/interpreting/doing “law”, even if it is infused with policy considerations in a way that the judicial function is (arguably) not. Does it follow that they should perform this “law” function in the same way that courts do? […] Read more
Comments
Presenting Administrative Law Values: a Note on the Inaugural Public Law Conference
Paul Daly September 24, 2014 Administrative law / Public law theory
Last week I presented my paper “Administrative Law: a Values-Based Approach” at the inaugural Public Law Conference at the University of Cambridge. I hope to have a few posts on the conference, focusing on panels that I attended. But I will start with a post on my own paper. By way of general comment, I […] Read more
Comments
Public Law Conference
Paul Daly September 15, 2014
Light blogging this week as I have just arrived in Cambridge for the inaugural Public Law Conference. You can download my paper on administrative law values here. I hope to have a round-up when I return! UPDATE: the links are not working, so here they are in turn: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2460264 http://www.publiclawconference.law.cam.ac.uk Read more
Comments
Considering Reconsiderations and the Procedural Rights of Market Incumbents
Paul Daly September 10, 2014 Administrative law
Here is a technical problem, discussed in Yellow Cab Company Ltd. v. Passenger Transportation Board, 2014 BCCA 329. When a decision-maker reconsiders, or refuses to reconsider a decision, what is the significance of the original decision for a judicial review application? As a general rule: [40] Where a party has taken advantage of […] Read more
Comments
Crowdsourcing Regulation? Anti-Spam Enforcement by the CRTC
Paul Daly September 9, 2014 Administrative law / Public law theory
I posted recently about Canada’s new anti-spam law, mentioning the challenges that the CRTC would face in implementing it. The CRTC has established a complaints mechanism which can be accessed via its website. Have a look here. It is proving popular: more than 1,000 complaints were received in the first week. By the end of […] Read more
Comments
Fusing Procedural and Substantive Review in Canada
Paul Daly September 8, 2014
This is the last extract from my forthcoming article, “Canada’s Bi-Polar Administrative Law: Time for Fusion“. I detail how procedural and substantive review might be fused and, in particular, why traditionalists should not flinch. Download the paper here. It is now necessary to consider how the two poles might be fused. One possibility is […] Read more